![]() |
| source |
A blog about a campaign world for Classic D&D
![]() |
| source |
After my last gaming group ceased I am now gathering a new band of adventurers and hoping to start a new campaign at our local boardgames cafe. This time rather than Descent into Avernus, I am going to run Out of the Abyss, another 5E hardback book for a campaign that should take the PCs from level 1 all the way up to high level (enough to take on demon lords at the end). This adventure combines two well-known aspects of D&D - the Underdark and demons.
Out of the Abyss starts with the characters as prisoners of the drow, along with a motley crew of fellow prisoner NPCs with their own backgrounds and motives. The first half of the adventure is about escaping the drow and the underdark and making it back to the surface while realising that demon lords are being summoned to the underdark and wreaking havoc. A bit like Descent into Avernus, I get the impression that the book contains the framework and major plot points of the adventure, but as the DM I will probably be fleshing out a lot of the encounters and obstacles along the way. I might be posting some of my homebrew stuff for Out of the Abyss in a similar way to my Descent into Avernus posts: we'll see how things turn out.
There have been numerous products that have looked at the underdark. Off the top of my head and from my own bookshelf, I would list
And of course there are plenty of fan projects and products
I may be speculating here, but I think it scratches a particular itch for exploration in a truly alien and dangerous environment. Real world caves are still a dangerous place to go if you are inexperienced and unprepared. And they do have ecosystems of sorts, from bats and bears near the surface to blind fish and albino insects much deeper. The ancient civilizations (Greeks, Meso-Americans and others) knew of these caves and thus began the idea of the mythic underworld, leading to the realm of Hades. It is no coincidence that many depictions of Hell from the real world place it deep underground.
The D&D Underdark is a mythic underworld of sorts, albeit codified and statted out for game rules. In a way it is the ultimate megadungeon - no party can hope to clear it out or even explore it entirely. For the most part the PCs will be away from safety, supplies and other benefits of towns and cities. It requires an expeditionary mind-set with preparation, plenty of supplies and an awareness of the challenges. Light is almost entirely absent, navigation is very difficult, food is hard to find and sometimes even the air one breathes cannot be taken for granted. Combine that with the psychological effects of isolation, claustrophobia, the threat of underground hazards such as cave-ins and chasms and it becomes clear why the Underdark takes on a reputation of being one of the most hostile environments a D&D adventurer can enter.
Does Mystara have an underdark like Oerth or Toril? Yes, although it is generally refered to as the Shadowdeep. A while ago I posted Tilphon's Journal of the Shadowdeep, the account of an Alphatian explorer starting his journey in the Shadowdeep beneath Brun. It has not yet received a part 2, but I think that is more because I am not used to the in-world journal style that I had a go at with that post rather than the environment being explored - I nearly always write from a DM's point of view not that of a character.
Nonetheless, in my version of Mystara the Shadowdeep is there, albeit one of the least explored aspects. One of the things I have drawn upon is issue #14 of Threshold Magazine. Threshold is an amateur magazine put together by members of the Vaults of Pandius and its associated Mystara forum on The Piazza.
Another important source has been the Gazetteer books, particularly Gaz13: The Shadow Elves. There are hints of underground realms in Gaz2: Emirates of Ylaruam, Gaz7: The Northern Reaches, Gaz4: The Dwarves of Rockhome and quite a lot in Gaz10: Orcs of Thar. Nonetheless, the Shadowdeep is a lot less developed than Faerun’s Underdark, probably because Mystara and B/X D&D has a vastly smaller audience than the Forgotten Realms and whatever the current edition of D&D is. The bad news is that this means more work for DMs wanting to run Shadowdeep adventures and campaigns. Good news is that the DM has a much more free hand in what they want to put there. And of course just because something in the gazetteers is canon, it doesn’t mean the DM has to stick to it in their campaign. If they want to replace shadow elves with drow or have drow as rivals to the shadow elves, that’s really up to them.
Having said that, I feel it is a good thing to keep the Shadowdeep distinct from the Underdark. I do not intend to bring drow, mindflayers, duergar, svirfneblin and the like to Mystara in this blog - the Shadowdeep is its own thing. To be honest I have mentioned kuo-toa in a post involving fish-folk. Although amusing at the time, I am not sure if it was sensible in the long run. A long time ago I did a similar post about my homebrew world of Kaelaross and its possible underdark, but I really didn’t come up with anything concrete or playable. And it is a big topic (and geographical volume) to explore and develop.
My current view is that it is something I can work on in various blog posts. I have a tendency to flit between realms and topics on this blog - Karameikos one week, Norwold another, then new spells, then a homebrew mini-adventure. So I’m not going to make a grand commitment to produce a new quasi-gazetteer, but I’m leaving the Shadowdeep open for me to visit in later blog posts.
![]() |
| art by Jeon Tae Kang source |
This is a collection of spells for chaotic clerics of a necromantic bent, and although there is a common theme of bones and skeletons these spells should be usable by a wide range of villains, from Eldritch Crusaders among the Arvorians of Norwold to the Cult of Chaos Divided in Alphatia, to the mummified priests of ancient Nithia, to the Hagiocracy of Hule. Note that many of these spells use skeletal parts of deceased humanoids and that these components disintegrate after the spell ends.
| art by Jeff Easley |
I have recently gotten hold of a PDF of the Holmes Basic edition of D&D. For those that don’t know, this was the edition that was intended to smarten up and clarify Original D&D (the three white books), then encouraged players to move on to Advanced D&D, yet was also the direct ancestor of Moldvay Basic D&D, which is the set I first had and was my introduction to this hobby. I was going to write about just Holmes Basic and what can be borrowed from it in my B/X D&D Mystara campaign, but I’ve ended up thinking about all editions of D&D.
I think a lot of people can get defensive and close-minded about editions. In my 40 years in the hobby I have seen a number of edition wars, waged in the Forum pages of Dragon Magazine, the early Usenet forums on the nascent world wide web and of course other online places like Reddit, EN World and various blogs. One thing that irks me is when people decide quite arbitrarily what is or is not “proper” D&D. This is often based on what edition they grew up with and played with their friends when they were discovering the game. I think it’s quite normal and natural to have a favourite edition, and that is probably going to be influenced by nostalgia. I myself wrote this blog because I wanted to get back to Moldvay Basic D&D, which I was given for Christmas 1982. It still is my favourite edition. But I try not to confuse nostalgia with being the “correct” edition, especially when talking to others.
I have always acknowledged that D&D is always changing. It has ever since it was first published. There are those who denounce the the three supplements to the white booklets, Supplement 1: Greyhawk, Supplement 2: Blackmoor & Supplement 3: Eldritch Wizardry as deviating from “proper D&D” which should be the three booklets (Men & Magic, Monsters & Treasure, Underworld & Wilderness Adventures) and nothing else. Thieves? Variable damage dice for weapons? Different hit dice for classes? Bah! Newfangled nonsense!. And I believe the game will continue to evolve. 5.5E probably won’t be the final edition. That doesn’t mean I will definitely play 6th or 7th edition if and when they are published, but I’ll try to have an open mind about them and not be bitter about WotC abandoning MY edition, or resentful to those who play the new ones. Players and DMs who prefer the older editions can still continue with the books they already have - the two downsides are that firstly WotC (or whatever publisher) won't be putting out more support for that edition; secondly new editions will split the fan base and a large number of players will move along to the new edition, reducing the number of potential players for the old edition.
I also think it is quite reasonable to like or dislike rules and mechanics within each edition. Some will veer towards the crunch-heavy side (5E and 3.5E spring to mind) while others will go for as rules-lite as possible (OD&D or its OSR imitators). Rules vs Rulings is often a matter of taste rather than objective quality. Sometimes the size of the books is more dependent on the options available rather than explaining the underlying mechanics - new races, feats, classes, subclasses, prestige classes, kits, spells, equipment, magic items and the like can all add to the page count. And I have seen lots of discussions (sometimes heated) about the pros and cons of different mechanics and rules, usually on the internet.
WotC can piss people off. And as a big corporation they have made some bad business decisions. That Pinkerton incident (yes I know it was about Magic the Gathering, not D&D, but it is still the same corporation) will haunt them for a long time. Good - they deserve to be reminded of it. And that attempt to rewrite the OGL did not go down well with anybody else. But I don’t think we should look at TSR through rose-tinted glasses either. Gary Gygax’s treatment of Dave Arneson, Lorraine Williams ousting of Gary in turn, TSR’s ferocious approach to amateur D&D work on the early web all show that big businesses will behave like big businesses. I remember on the Usenet forums before TSR went bankrupt it was regularly referred to as T$R, and some players were regularly advocating piracy as T$R didn’t deserve their money. Despite all these corporate shenanigans I have not been put off from buying TSR or WotC products as long as I am interested in the actual product. Other people can boycott WotC if they want, and I’m not going to argue with them. But I don’t have to join in either.
OD&D (Gygax & Arneson, 1974): I do have the PDFs, but I have never actually played it. Seeing as I don’t have Chainmail rules, I don’t think I’ll even try as it looks like a disorganised mess. But I do know that other people still play it and that retroclones of it have done well.
Holmes Basic D&D (Eric J Holmes, 1977): Like I said earlier, I have recently acquired the PDF. It is interesting and is the branching point for B/X from AD&D. I probably won’t use anything in it but it is nice to read as an important part of D&D history. The presentation and explanation has greatly improved from OD&D.
B/X D&D (Moldvay, Cook, Marsh, 1981): The first rules I owned (the magenta Basic D&D box with Keep on the Borderlands), and the rules I played with in prep school (ages 10-12). Very formative years, and lots of nostalgia. I still like the relative lightness of the rules even if I have sometimes found the race-as-class idea somewhat restrictive.
BECMI D&D (Frank Mentzer, 1983): I was given Mentzer's Expert boxed set rather than the Cook/Marsh one, with the Larry Elmore cover. I reckon BECMI is so close to B/X that they are effectively the same edition though with very different presentations - perhaps Basic D&D 1.5. I also have the Companion rules and the Masters Rules (though the Masters Rules are only as a PDF). Honorable mention goes to the Rules Cyclopedia, the most complete game in one book that I own, and it is often the D&D book I take on holiday. Incidentally this is the edition I used to play D&D with nephews and nieces a long time ago (we had a week's holiday together and they were between 8 and 12 I think - the oldest is now 26).
1st Edition AD&D (Gary Gygax, 1977+): This is what I started playing at boarding school, particularly the earlier half (age 13-15). Again lots of nostalgia during formative years. I had nearly all the hardback books. The fact that it was Advanced, not Basic, made us feel more grown-up.... There are things about this edition that I still enjoy and refer to, such as the appendices in the back of the DMG.
2nd Edition AD&D (David Zeb Cook, 1989); The later years of boarding school (age 16 to 17) saw the introduction of 2E and my D&D friends and I switched. There was of course the assumption that newer is better, but we ended up playing a mash-up of 1E and 2E, with older modules, assassins, monks and half orcs making their appearances in our 2E games. I still like how 2E clarified the rules, improved the Ranger and Bard classes, actually had a consistent mechanic for surprise and was a little less arbitrary than Gary’s 1E. However, it was also somewhat less flavourful and played it a bit too safe (I was disappointed at the initial lack of devils & demons, though they were brought back later). I bought more 2E books at university (including Dark Sun, Planescape and lots of Forgotten Realms books) but at university I never really found a group I was comfortable playing with.
3rd Edition D&D (Monte Cook, Skip Williams, Jonathan Tweet, 2000). I bought a lot of the books but I didn't get to play much - this was definitely a dry period, where I spent a lot of time world-building and dreaming of creating great adventures and supplements but never getting them further than my hard drive. There were some things about this edition I really liked, but others I was less enthusiastic about. One of the great things was the Open Game License which allowed all sorts of third-party products including adventures, settings and even whole games based off D&D, which led to retro-clones and the OSR. The thing I least liked about this was the increasing complexity - the skills system, calculating monster XP, the massive bloat in terms of feats and prestige classes. A lot of my world building and unpublished adventurers ended up summarising NPCs as race, class & alignment rather than doing proper stat blocks, which could get really big for high level characters.
4th Edition D&D (Rob Heinsoo, James Wyatt, 2008): I skipped this one. I did actually buy the three core books but on perusing I decided I didn’t like it. I didn’t even get to try the mechanics - I was put off by the radical changes to things like races, alignment, adding new classes & races, dropping established ones and telling players and D&Ds “Don’t bother trying to convert your old campaign to 4E, just start a new campaign with these new classes, races & cosmology”. And I just went “Nope.” The best thing that 4th Edition did was to push me towards the OSR (Old School Revival) where I found retroclones such as OSRIC, Swords & Wizardry and of course my favourite, Labyrinth Lord, which led me back to Basic D&D. To be fair there wasn't much opportunity for actual play during this period either. However, I became more active on the internet, including joining EN World, Dragonsfoot and the now-defunct Goblinoid Games forum. And of course I started my blog during this period.
5th Edition D&D (Mike Mearls, Jeremy Crawford, 2014): I bought the core books fairly early on, soon after each one was released, but I didn’t get to play until a few years ago at a board games cafe. Since then I’ve played more 5E than almost any other edition. The current edition always has a competitive edge over out-of-print editions, and although I was hoping to run a B/X game, the demand was for 5E. It turns out to be a pretty good, decent system - the campaign would not have lasted 2 years if I thought the rules were complete crap. It is more rules-intensive than B/X or AD&D, but not intolerably so. The campaign I have been running has recently ended unexpectedly. This is sad, but I do not regret the time and effort I spent running it. The two years or so DMing the campaign has meant I have gotten used to 5E and perhaps even some confidence in running it. Beforehand I had the books but really didn’t know what it felt like to play: Now I do.
Orcs are second only to humans as the most populous humanoids of the Known World. They have made their homes wherever they can, including across other regions and continents of Mystara, usually in places that humans have decided not to colonise. Mountains, dense forests, caves and swamps are all potential homes for orcs.
![]() |
| Image by Sam Wood from D&D 3E Monster Manual |
Orcs are nearly always chaotic in alignment. The reason behind this is not clear - is it nature or nurture? If a baby orc was taken from its tribe and raised in human society, how would the orc turn out, and what alignment of cosmic forces would it associate with? The results are few and far between, but they do indicate that it is a combination of tribal ways and deeply embedded instincts. Those orcs raised in civilised places are nearly always aggressive and short-tempered, and often respecting might more than morals - the pecking order is how they fit into society. However, these civilised orcs are also able to curb their wanton violence, follow the rules and can often become useful members of society as long as they have some authority keeping an eye on them. Left to their own devices they have a habit of reverting to chaotic behaviours.
Orcs are nearly always tribal rather than completely feral - they naturally gather into groups and although within the group there is a hierarchy enforced by occasional violence, there is also a certain tribal cohesion and loyalty. Reading and writing is rare, and usually taught by other races, and even then it is only some of the more intelligent orcs that become literate - often chiefs, shamans and those with potential for leadership. Oral tradition is the mainstay of orcish culture - stories and verbal histories are how orcs understand their place in the world. And it is also how they remind each other of how orcs have been wronged and cheated out of their rightful place as the masters of Mystara. A bit like within a tribe, orcs see different races as a pecking order, a hierarchy of strength. Bugbears and ogres are bigger and tougher individually but not as numerous, while goblins and kobolds are small runts to be kicked and bossed around.
There are some races whose history with the orcs is too bitter, too unjust, to be tolerated. Elves and dwarves are at the top of this list and will usually be attacked on sight, but humans, gnomes and halflings are often viewed as no better, and subject to a similar hatred and aggression from the orcs. The orcs of the Cruth Mountains for example have a mixed view of halflings - sometimes as soft and easy targets to be enslaved and bullied, but at other times (particularly when the hin fight back) as vermin to be exterminated without mercy.
It is fortunate that orcs are not good at getting together into a large coherent nation - they are so numerous they would threaten and probably overrun any current nation. One example of orcs actually gathering in strength was the recent attack on Dukes Road Keep, which nearly fell to the orcish horde. As it is, they are so disparate and disorganised that many adventurers start off their careers taking on small bands of orcs that are threatening trade caravans or farmsteads. Nonetheless, their nearly continual presence on the borders of civilization means that all nations need some sort of defence force to protect their citizens from orcish predation. Even if that nation is involved in all-out war with another realm, they would have to be truly desperate or singleminded to strip away the militia defending villages and towns. Orcs are the footsoldiers of Chaos, the ever-present threat that seeks to destroy civilization, the ravening horde of evil.
| Ravening Horde by Chris Achilleos |
Note that few of these are coherent nations - many are just gatherings of tribes who are as likely to attack each other as to fight other races. No populations are given as their numbers fluctuate according to food supply and success or failure in battle. Besides, it allows the DM to muster as many orcs as his adventure requires. This collection of regions is not complete, and there are plenty of other places orcs might be found. The ones listed here are generally in mountainous terrain and mountains are favoured by orcs because humans, their greatest rivals, are less likely to settle there, but as mentioned above, orcs can live in all sorts of environments.
The Black Peaks: Between the Republic of Darokin to the north and Grand Duchy of Karameikos to the south, the Black Peaks are part of the group of mountain ranges that run through the Known World, connecting to the Altan Tepes to the east and Cruth mountains to the west. The orcs here are dangerously restless and often fall under the sway of powerful creatures such as red dragons, hill giants and malevolent wizards. Their most recent display of strength was the attack on the Duke’s Road Keep. Where the Black peaks join the Altan Tepes there is Castellan Keep and the Caves of Chaos. Some of the orcs here have thrown their lot in with the Cult of Chaos, though others are more reticent and stay independent.
The Cruth Mountains: This range sits between southern Darokin and the Five Shires, and is really an extension of the Black Peaks. The orcs here have been a major threat to the Hin, and several times in history have conquered the Five Shires, enslaving the halflings there. Although they have been beaten back, they nonetheless have numerous tribes in the Cruth Mountains ready for another opportunity to attack the small folk. Interestingly these orcs are not particularly interested in Darokin to the north, perhaps seeing the humans as tougher or maybe not as profitable.
The Orclands: To the northeast of Darokin, north of Selenica and Alfheim, there is the Dwarfgate Mountains, named because they link Darokin to the dwarf land of Rockhome. However, this region is more colloquially known as the Orclands because of the large number of orcs and other humanoids that dominate here. It is fair to say that the Darokin Army has lost strategic control of the land between the mountains and Alfheim to the orcs. Deep in these mountains is a stronghold of Chaos called Derothgar. Although dominated by chaotic humans, nonetheless Derothgar exerts a powerful influence on the surrounding orc tribes, offering bribes or punishment as the leaders in Derothgar see fit.
The Broken Lands: This is the main realm of the orcs, ruled by the great king Thar who manages to hold together various humanoid populations in what is known as the Great Horde. There are 3 main groups of orc here, Orcus Rex, Yellow Orkia (the Akkila Khanate) and Red Orcland (Wogaria). The orcs here believe they are the central hub of the orc race. Most other orcs beyond the Broken Lands are not even aware the Great Horde exists, let alone paying attention to it.
Norwold: Orcs dwell in the far north of Brun and compete with other arctic and subarctic races, fighting with elves, lupins and human colonists. They are usually in independent tribes but some have fallen under the sway of the Arvorians, acting as foot soldiers, servants and labourers. Although not quite the massive threat faced by some nations further south, that may be because in Norwold there are even greater monstrous predators such as white dragons and frost giants (not to mention the Arvorians) that orcs seem secondary in comparison.
The standard orc given in the Basic Rules is still the default and if there is no particular reason why they should be different, then those are the stats used. There may well be variations, particularly if the orcs are given pole-arms or missile weapons (bows or crossbows). for example, from the adventure Berresford's Ruined Tower we have
Crossbow Orc: AC 7, Mv 90ft, HD 1, hp 4 each, THAC0 19, Att 1 crossbow bolt (range 80/160/240) for 1d6 or hand axe (melee) for 1d6, Save F1, Ml 7, Align C, 10 XP, equipment: leather armour, light crossbow, 10 bolts, hand axe, 10sp
Tougher leaders can be done using the stats in the Basic Rules for leaders and chiefs. However, I prefer to use my homebrew rules for humanoid NPCs. Orc shamans likewise use these new rules. If I am using multiple minor orc leaders in an adventure I may well give them a standard stat block though this is usually based on them being 2nd level orc warriors. For example from the adventure Iseldek's Drop:
I know that both Gaz10 The Orcs of Thar and the Rules Cyclopedia have rules for Wiccans (also known as witch-doctors) the magic users of the humanoids. However, I tend not to use Wiccans as studying arcane magic does not really fit with my idea of orcs, and you probably won’t see them on this blog.
![]() |
| source |
The Selenica Co-operative is a network of merchants who have agreed to work together to stay in business and protect themselves and their goods. As the name suggests, the group is centred on Selenica in eastern Darokin and as such is on a crossroads between various nations including Karameikos, the Five Shires, Ylaruam and Rockhome. The merchants are all travelling traders, moving goods and money around between cities and countries, and generally do not maintain static shops, though they often trade with those that do.
The four main functions of the cooperative are
The Kenshai Hills are an extensive range of uplands that are to the northeast of Caloma. They are not entirely civilized and even when Caloma was a coherent nation rather than a miscellany of city states, these hills were considered borderlands, not exactly part of the kingdom but somewhere to expand into when the hills are made safe enough. Thanks to the Caloma civil war that will not happen for a long time to come. Nonetheless, numerous villages, outposts and other communities dot the hills. There are various tribes and other groups in the Kenshai hills, including a band of rangers, a circle of druids, several barbaric tribes and numerous humanoids, both hostile and benevolent.
The Wild Badger clan is nearly entirely halflings, and they have a number of villages to the north of Fort Perilous, some on the Shelffur River. They herd sheep and goats and make cheese and woolen garments.
As noted in my first post on 5.5E NPCs, these NPCs are not perfectly accurate by PHB rules but should be good enough for NPC use.![]() |
| source |
![]() |
| source |
![]() |
| Cartography by Dyson Logos, source |